Session Review: Credibility in Responsive Design

By Sylvia Miller

 

Have you ever looked at a webpage, perhaps of your own content, on a desktop computer and wondered, “What would this look like on a mobile device? What will become tiny, and what will not be visible at all?”   Dr. Clinton R. Lanier presented an excellent session at the Summit on responsive web design (RWD) titled “How to Fix the Credibility Problem When Using Responsive Design.” I’d like to share some key points here in case you, like many technical communicators, are now having to develop for both desktop and mobile device viewing.

First, a few basic facts to remember when developing content that will be viewed on both a desktop computer and a much smaller mobile device:

  • Online content has to be optimized to the viewing window in which it is being displayed.
  • Online content can immediately (“on the fly”) arrange or rearrange to fit the screen’s width.
  • You might need to exclude some content or resize items.
  • Designers decide how the above is accomplished.

Dr. Lanier began by establishing that (a) content must be indexed to be found online, (b) content competes against other content created by random people or organizations, and (c) the content must be responsive to multiple viewing platforms for viewing preferences and search engine optimization (SEO). “Therefore, content from legitimate organizations must appear credible as a requirement to be used,” he asserted. He noted that little attention is paid to the credibility of responsive/mobile sites with much more attention being paid to usability.

So what makes a website credible, you ask? Quoting from 2007, 2009, and 2011 studies, Dr. Lanier gave many characteristics of credible websites, including these:

  • Visual design (graphics and structure)
  • Social cue design (human-like features, assistive interface)
  • Informative-ness and informational quality
  • Brand alliances
  • E-Assurances
  • Usefulness and ease of use
  • Third-party recognition
  • Consumer feedback mechanism
  • Sponsor credibility (information source, advertisements on the page)

A 2014 study done at Dr. Lanier’s university—New Mexico State—made some interesting findings about RWD. Researchers randomly separated 53 participants, median age of 36 years who were native English speaking, into two groups. One group read an article on a desktop (Mac with wide screen), while the other group read the same article on a smart phone. Both groups completed a questionnaire afterwards. Participants were asked to judge the credibility of the website, article, and author on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being lowest and 5 being highest. They were asked the following:

  • How likely are you to agree with the author’s point?
  • How credible did you find the website that published this article?
  • How credible did you find the author of this study?
  • How important is the argument made by the author?
  • How accurate did you find the information in the article?
  • Please write the name of the website this article was published on.
  • Please write the name of the author who wrote this article.
  • Your age
  • Do you use a smart phone to view websites?
  • Do you use a desktop computer to view websites?
  • Have you ever read this article?
  • Have you ever heard of the author of this article?
  • Have you ever visited this website?

The participants judged the desktop version to be MORE credible for ALL questions except two: (a) how credible did you find the author; and (b) how important is the argument made by the author. The sponsor (in this case, The Chronicle of Higher Education,) did not appear in the smart phone’s window: The credibility that would have been earned by the article from its association with the renowned publication was lost. Plus, the lack of any peripheral information did not allow readers to judge associations. Also, graphics in the smart phone’s window took up way too much real estate, as did the font size of the article’s title.

Dr. Lanier advised, as a result of the study, that to maintain credibility in web content we ensure a site is usable and functional, and information is grammatically and technically accurate. We should also ensure that the logo is prominent and at the top and remains prominent and in view. He also urged us to ensure that some authority is mentioned before the content and provide peripheral information immediately to establish associations. And, of course, we should ensure that the author is attributed immediately and prominently. These are all great points to remember when developing content for responsive web design.

Summit 2017: Session Reviews

By Jamye Sagan

 

During the 2017 STC Summit at National Harbor, MD, I attended several interesting, insightful presentations. Here are highlights of some of them.

 

 

Picture Perfect! How to Turn Words and Data into Powerful Graphics

Mike Parkinson (@Mike_Parkinson)

Graphics creation has always been of interest to me, as graphics can complement the written narratives I must prepare as part of my IDL work. So, I thought this presentation would suit my needs perfectly – and it did.

Parkinson explained how pictures are easier to understand than words, by demonstrating how more effective a diagram of how to tie a tie was vs. a paragraph on how to do so.

He also explained the “concept and render” method for transforming data into graphics. “Concept” pertains to defining one’s audience and determining what message to convey to them, while “render” refers to the physical assembly of the message into something visual. Parkinson provided a handy poster illustrating which chart/graphic element works best for visualizing data.

What I found most intriguing is that the designer need not have the fanciest software to create graphics. Parkinson demonstrated how he used PowerPoint to create an image of a padlock, which he incorporated into a graphic showing bullet points about keeping data secure. Here the graphic—a padlock—resonates with the message of data security.

Very useful presentation!

 

 On track! Running Effective Meetings

Viqui Dill (@viqui_dill)

Oftentimes, meetings can be a waste of time because they go all over the place without  a clear purpose. In her spotlight talk, Dill shared useful advice for conducting meetings, including:

  • Establishing a parking lot for ideas not relevant to the meeting topic. Doing so not only helps keep the meeting on track, but also communicates respect for the teammate bringing up the idea.
  • Collecting feedback, especially CONSTRUCTIVE feedback about how the meeting could have gone better

Dill kept her presentation fun yet educational with her aerodynamic icebreakers (I won my flying pig by knowing the Wright brothers’ names!) – another tip for conducting effective meetings: Dill swears by icebreakers because they get people talking, interacting and thinking.

I was most surprised to hear that meeting attendees should not generate any deliverables at meetings, especially if the purpose of the meeting is to discuss a specific subject. I had to ponder that statement for a bit, because sometimes we do have meetings where we actually do create or edit deliverables. However, if that is not the meeting’s purpose, then of course deliverables should not be created.

Fun and effective talk!

 

Six Super Success Hacks

Leah Guren (@Leah4CowTC)

In her spotlight talk, Guren shared six actions people can take to become more professionally successful. These tips include:

  • Work your calendar – review your calendar at the start and at the end of the day. Also review your calendar at the beginning of the week. The most valuable piece of advice Guren gives is “check first, commit later” because if you miss a deadline, you risk being perceived as unreliable and unprofessional.
  • Stop lying to yourself. Work with your nature, not against. Ask yourself: How long did this take last time? What works best for me?
  • Lobby for the user. According to Guren, if you focus on the users’ needs, everyone wins! Ask yourself: How does this help the user? Am I providing my client with the right options?
  • Communicate like a pro. Guren recommends that you treat all text with respect, AND
  • Find the spotlight. Sometimes, this is hard since many of us have been conditioned to not brag about ourselves. However, modesty wins no awards. Ask yourself: What did I initiate? How did I contribute to the user experience or the bottom line?
  • Fake it ‘til you make it. Guren demonstrated how taking a power stance with one’s body can help build feelings of confidence: Body language can greatly help in building confidence Wonder Woman and Superman immediately came to mind. It really does work!

Guren also shared one final piece of incredibly SAGE advice, which I try to follow: Spend at least one hour a week to read articles and publications pertaining to your profession.

 

Video Provides the Edge

Mark Kleinsmith (@kleiny7352)

In his presentation, Kleinsmith explains how technical communicators should start embracing the “YouTube world”, which is to provide more video in support of autonomous work, since many people (especially millennials), tend to try 3-5 different strategies for troubleshooting the problem themselves before calling for help. In my work, I always google how to perform certain actions in the software applications I use – with much success.

Kleinsmith also argues that videos create bonds with customers, in that they readily provide information in a captivating, easy to digest way. He also explains how to incorporate videos into content–from editing software (Adobe Audition) to robust hosting platforms (Vimeo) that enable private viewing and user stats.

This presentation gave me much food for thought, about how to better incorporate video in my work – from embedding software tutorials in email communications, to using our in-house communication channels to promote these videos.

 Know Your Client’s Language

Chrystal Mincey (@Annika_2822)

Knowing what your client expects and what they want to accomplish are crucial to the project’s success. In her presentation, Mincey shared some tips for how to understand your client’s needs.  Main takeaways include:

  • Understand your role in helping your client reach the end goal. This includes knowing:
    • What the client expects
    • What their end goal is
    • Who is responsible for what
    • What the deadlines, schedules, and milestones are
  • Begin projects with the end in mind.
  • Always use style guides. If none exists, create one.
  • The client is always right – but may be open to change.

It all boils down to effective communication and never losing sight of the finish line.

 

So You Think You Know What Your Readers Want?

Yoel Strimling (@reb_yoel)

You know the saying “don’t make assumptions because they make an…”? Making wrong assumptions about the audience, dear readers, can result in our work not being as effective as it should. In his presentation, Strimling explains the research that is needed to determine what readers really are looking for, vs. what writers think readers need. In essence, readers want accurate, clear, and relevant documentation that provides VALUE. Readers want to feel it was their worthwhile to use the documentation that it made their tasks easier to perform.

Strimling effectively used a pen analogy in describing intrinsic quality of documentation.

When writing a letter, would one rather have a beautiful pen with no ink, or a cheap-looking pen with ink? Since the purpose is writing a letter, and not just gazing at the pen, the obvious choice here is the pen that works. In other words, if the documentation looks attractive but does not serve the intended purpose, it is useless.

Overall, Strimling challenged us writers to put ourselves in the readers’ shoes and ask ourselves: “If I were the reader, would this deliverable help me do my job better?” Now, whenever I design any materials, whether it be job aids or department memos, I always ask myself this question. It’s helped me focus on the purpose at hand, and what my readers need.

 

The Gamification of Instructional Design

Phylise Banner (@phylisebanner)

In her session, Banner took an interesting approach to showing how to incorporate play in the overall instructional design process. She demonstrated how to use the Learning Battle Cards (https://www.learningbattlecards.com/\) in exploring different aspects of instructional design.

Learning Battle Cards, which consist of a deck of 100+ cards, describe various forms of learning. Each card contains a wealth of information on:

  • Where in the instructional design process the concept occurs, from beginning to end
  • Type of learning (e.g. self-learning, formal, asynchronous)
  • Ranking of various characteristics pertaining to: production effort and time required by the educator, process effectiveness, and engagement and difficulty of use by the student.

Banner split us into smaller group and guided us in an exercise where we devised a basic training plan based on the cards we drew. These cards really helped us to look at instructional situations from different perspectives. Even if some of the concepts were unknown, our group still had fun devising a training plan for the project at hand. Although the cards right now are a bit pricey for my budget, I would like to eventually purchase a deck for my own enrichment.

 

How May I Help You?

Todd DeLuca (@TechCommTodd)

In his spotlight talk, DeLuca uses an analogy, likening technical communicators to restaurant workers. Are we the cooks, who toil behind the scenes? Or are we the waiters, who serve upfront? Of course, the customers are the diners enjoying the meal.

DeLuca proposes that technical communicators be more like waiters, since waiters interact with the customer and are therefore closest to the customers’ needs and expectations. There is nothing wrong with being behind the scenes like the cook, but one runs the risk of being too far removed from the customer.

I played around with DeLuca’s analogy in my mind: Technical communicators can also be chefs who emerge from the kitchen doors to showcase their dishes to the customers. After all, look at Wolfgang Puck or any other famous chef! How best to serve your customers? Well, getting to know them of course!

IDL SIG Represents at the STC PMC Conduit 2017 Conference

By Viqui Dill

On April 1, 2017, the STC Philadelphia Metro Chapter hosted their annual regional conference, Conduit 2017. Many members of the Instructional Design and Learning special interest group attended the conference, and several made presentations.

Members in attendance

 

Revive and Thrive: Strategies for the Introvert in Today’s Workplace

by Ben Woelk

Today’s workplace presents challenges for introverted team members. Business schools focus on producing extraverted leaders, although as much as 50% of the workforce are introverts and there’s no evidence that extraverts make better leaders than introverts. Many workplaces are adopting open space layouts that foster teamwork, but provide little opportunities for introverts to contribute as individuals. Because of Western society’s emphasis on extraversion, many introverts feel unsuited or ill-equipped to thrive in today’s workplace and are not sure how to take that next step to increase influence and improve visibility.

In this workshop, I learned about myself and the others in the session. One of the attendees was Donn DeBoard, with whom I had worked on the STC Nominating Committee. Donn and I are both “idealists” who focus on possibilities and want to empower others. Our similar personalities made us a great team during the STC elections nominating process. We worked together to see the strengths and potential in each of the candidates we interviewed and as a result, brought a very strong ballot to the 2016-2017 STC board elections.

Ben Woelk’s Revive and Thrive workshop: Introverts in the back, extraverts up front.

 

The Art of Personal Branding: How to Tell the “You” Story and Gain New Customers

by Liz Fraley

If you want someone to hire you or your company, you need to be able to tell your story: who you are, what your plan is, and what defines you. There are key points to address at each point in the story in order to gain customers. Whether you’re the boss or on your own, you are constantly telling your story.

This session was particularly useful to those working for equity, or starting a business. Liz focused on:

  • How to gain customers by telling your story;
  • How to identify who your customer is (and is not); and
  • How to identify the keys to telling your story well.

Liz’s presentation energized me to focus on my own strengths, leveraging the strengths of business partners where I am weak. She also gave us permission to let our work-selves and our home-selves be the same person. We don’t have to have two different worlds with two different personalities. My take-away from her session was to know who I am, and to know who I serve.

Liz Fraley’s Art of Personal Branding Session

On track! Running an effective meeting is more than the agenda.

by Viqui Dill

Every techcomm project includes a series of meetings. Requirements gathering and status updates are necessary parts of every project. But attending a meeting means that team members are not making progress on tasks or deliverables. How can we ensure that we make the most of this necessary evil?

This presentation offered proven solutions for meeting management. Starting up front with an engaging icebreaker, gathering expectations about what should be accomplished during the meeting, and then collecting feedback at the end will make your meeting more effective and your team more productive.

During the session, I divided the group into two teams to play a communications history trivia game. The winning team received a flying animal toy as the prize. Since the score was so close, I gave prizes to both teams. That’s when I lost control of the meeting. The prizes were so engaging with the flying and the screaming, attendees began to focus on the toys and not the presentation. In addition, the icebreaker had done such a good job of breaking the ice and getting the group talking and interacting, that they continued to engage and interact, even after I wanted them to settle down and listen to the material. So even though I came to teach, I was the one who learned a valuable lesson about meeting management.

Viqui Dill’s On Track Presentation

Thanks everyone! Seriously, thank you.

Tim Esposito shows off his flying sock monkey at the On Track presentation

Want to go next year?

The 2018 Conduit conference is already in the planning stages. Save the Dates: Friday, April 6 – Saturday, April 7, 2018 for another engaging conference by the STC Philadelphia Metro chapter http://www.stcpmc.org/conferences/conduit-2018/

IDL SIG Members Elected to STC Board

Congratulations to our members who were elected to society level office in the 2017-2018 elections. We are proud of each and every member and very happy to announce these three elected members. You can read more about them in the associated links on the STC website https://www.stc.org/about-stc/board-of-directors/  .

Jane Wilson – Vice President

https://www.stc.org/jane-wilson/

 

James Bousquet – Treasurer

https://www.stc.org/james-bousquet/

 

Robert Perry – Director

https://www.stc.org/robert-perry/

 

Read more about the election results in the STC Notebook blog: https://www.stc.org/notebook/2017/03/15/stc-2017-election-results/